Just like the 3 major US credit institutions; which is why we asked #TwitterFiles leakers for the Digital ID drips.
United States common law provides for self-ownership in practice, in publication and in moral exercise. There are miles of US precedent that would support this. However, it has been a very tiny sieve of technocratic gatekeepers who are actively coordinating digital sanctions and censorship from the public-private sector: BRICS grey data exchanges for money, the World-Economic Forum, and Democratic Socialist technocratic oligarchs from the United States. It was only vigilant activists who have made null past attempts to produce a US based mandate for globalized identity articles as NSTIC and Real ID.
It is these globalized interests who now claim the way to recover from bad times is to cull government identity through a social credit system run and controlled by them. The very same interests have used their influence in the past to control and subvert US identity ownership claims. They now want to pose “sovereign- ID” as a promissory note, granted by their underworld monarch/oligarch/fascists, on your total access to digital exchanges. This is to eliminate cash altogether for being “filthy”, “infection laden” and “antiquated” as follow up act to COVID-19 mass hysteria. Apparently, monarchic communist serfdom is now “modern”, while anything analog they cannot administrate, categorize and manipulate to arbitrary sanction is “antequated” [SOURCE].
In order to move the West into a caste-system regressed to serf-squalor, as proposed by the World Economic Forum and adopted by many G20 leaders, they ask for the voluntary-compulsory use of national identity articles, digtal IDs, and central banked digital currencies (CBDCs) to get the West onto a Chinese-styled social credit system.
An example of Great Reset policy undertaking soveriegn UK democratic elections, was the sudden partisan ouster of Liz Truss to punch in Rishi Sunak, heir apparent to Infosys fortunes. The family business at Infosys developed and promulgated the PRC’s current social credit system architecture, down washed as a banal “regulatory framework”.
In the past, the United States government has allowed the 3 major credit agencies to essentially bully and to deny the US consumer access to correcting their records and or regulating them for inaccuracies. The credit agencies require an exhaustive amount of personal records as proof of identity and will still hold a positive correction hostage. So it is entirely possible to make the connection how the WEF got the impression they would have the latitude to bully and coerce Americans and Westerners using the same subterranean objectives.
Social media companies and mobile payment systems have been recruited for a harmonized integration of digital identity articles and digital pay systems, modeled similar to China’s WePay and AliPay. Apple announced several US States authenticated mobile processing for iPhone. Android recently released notes on ways to offer government IDs. There is much left to be proven as to the licenses and identity will remain secured in a very dicey mobile online environment without encryption.
Under former CEO Jack Dorsey, responsible for Stripe mobile payment processing, Twitter toyed with the idea of certifying government identity for their platform in verification schemes. As soon as this week, members of the neoliberal caucuses decrying “national security” over Twitter’s radical change of the guard, are now aggressively seeking to add more government identity requirements. This of course to rival Musk’s democratized low barrier to verification of an $8 fee. A significant challenge to pay-to-play blue checkmark outrages over “verification” auths. Some of unseemly blue check verifications cost up to $15K and the jobs of former employees who pocketed the “fees”.
There is no requirement on any social media platform to have a verified ID to speak in the United States. However, payment sanctions by PayPal and other banking institutions were linked to dissent over COVID-19 governance in Europe and most noteably in Canada.
In order to stem the tide of identity requirements held and certified by large federated institutions, The Identified Person has to self advocate for credit agency reforms, corresponding privacy limitations in data exchanges with their information abroad as mean currency, and to regain control over their biometric security in government derived identity articles.
For a future where fewer people in foreign establishments dictate terms of what you can say and buy down the street, you need to get involved now. Make the calls, write the letters to leadership and show up in town halls for who you already own: yourself.
