There appears to be different levels of compliance occurring at the moment and over the last couple of years in people. We are in a time when we’re being subjected to a multitude of changes, rewrites and a restructuring of the technological society that surrounds us. Within that, the people who are making the changes and rolling out these new systems and procedures, need a certain level of compliance, for a certain number to ‘play the game’ that they have decided to enact. Not everyone will want to play, so they would have had to decide on methods for uptake, and keeping people tagging along for as long as possible. I’ll break down the categories people fell into from my perspective.
Dumb compliance – this is a knee jerk reaction way to get people, and does not mean they are dumb or stupid. It means they were caught unaware, often they have reacted, rather than acted, and with limited information at hand and quite possibly with the motivation of fear. I believe quite a few people got caught out by this in the early days of the debacle. Running around like headless chickens as one might say.
Knowing compliance – Where they knew something was up, but were more frightened of the consequences of not complying than they were with the stark warning starting to come from us ‘conspiracy folk’. When they know deep down, they shouldn’t go along with it, but again through a type of fear, they comply. Either scared of being judged, scared of what you are told you to be afraid of, or just scared of not following orders, some people really are happier being told what to do.
Blind compliance – where they ignored all the warnings from people because they ‘weren’t qualified’ or didn’t fit the mainstream narrative. They chose to put their trust and faith, blindly, in the system, and those that pushed it.
Sinister Compliance – the ones above are more for the people who found themselves on the receiving end of the drive to inject the world. This category I feel is more for the ones behind the needle, they don’t get much attention yet as the injured are rightly trying to take a centre stage at the moment, but it seems their time will come. I noted at the time they were making a big deal about having very meticulous records of who was dispensing each shot, and GP’s although given great financial incentives to be part of it, many it seemed went to ground and didn’t partake. Why would that be do you think? Did they too think ahead and see that they would be the ones holding the needle, therefore holding the liability if it all went wrong? So, this category is for the ones who knowingly or at least blindly ‘just followed orders’ to do their bit, to deliver in some cases, a slow working mortal shot to the unsuspecting ‘volunteer’.
Non-compliance – the control group as they were dubbed. The ones who from either day one, or slowly along the way trusted their own judgement and instinct instead of what they were told. They trusted what they knew, saw, heard and felt. But they are a problem to the project at large, highlighting and proving the case in point all along. The risk was low from what they said to be afraid of, and the risk was high for the product they were pushing. It should have been a no brainer.
But when all sides are working against you, the media, the gov, the medical establishment, venues, employers etc, I can see why so many caved or were convinced. Those departments were instructed to do that, regulations and laws invented to create the perfect set up. And make no mistake, it was a set up, and continue to be a trap that some keep willingly walking into. It’s a shame that so many people turned on their own friends or family though, those people were not regulated or mandated to do that, but they were encouraged somewhat. Through use of a ‘nudge unit’ no less, a group of paid behavioural specialists who sat down and decided how to make that happen, I’ll go into that though in a separate article. But just to highlight that these things didn’t ‘just occur’ or indeed happen ‘by accident’. They preyed on people who were indecisive and unsure about things, and they attacked people who were sure of themselves, decisive, and confident.
And based on the above results, they have determined a future outcome, and have said
“Covid-19 was the test of social responsibility – A huge number of unimaginable restrictions for public health were adopted by billions of citizens around the world”.
They seem to believe this means people will do it again, keeping in mind that many were forced to adopt these measures, if you remember some of the footage we got and still get from China about their social credit system already in place, but how they had people ‘dropping like flies’ in the streets, people being welded into their apartments and streets being fumigated. And many that may have gone along with it, could have believed in the threat at first, and maybe were fearful, but possibly more of the consequences of disobeying. So, if you are part of the fear camp, you may want to ask yourself what is it you are or were afraid of? Are you afraid of them? Or of what they tell you to be afraid of? Because being fearful can serve a purpose to you, and be helpful when acting as a signal, or an alarm, but not when misdirected for someone or something else’s benefit. I can’t help thinking though that too many people’s way of thinking and seeing things has changed, and what happened above won’t be like that again. It seems many who rushed to answer the governments calls to ‘keep everyone safe’ are either not with us anymore, or aren’t in the best shape. Predicted to only get worse the longer they stay on the market and keep being administered, so the number of followers and believers of their ‘pandemic’ are not what they once were, with much being revealed of just how underhanded and criminal it really was. I guess we just have to wait to see how that plays out, and all I can hope is that people don’t fall for it again, or believe them when they for yours and everyone’s ‘health and safety’, it was a trap then and will continue to be, using your social conscience against you for their ‘greater good’ not yours. We would do well to keep that in mind.